|
Maybe the following will clear some of this up
(maybe it won't).
Most lenses are designed to image straight lines
as straight lines on film, wherever they might
appear. So generally, 'distortion' (ie, the imaging
of straight lines as slightly bowed on the film) is
supposed to be kept to a minimum. Most SLR
wideangle (and other) lenses cannot do this
perfectly, so compromises come into play. However,
for most purposes they do a good job and we don't
object (too much) to the slight curves we see,
mostly near the edges, when we look at pictures of
objects we know are blessed with straight edges in
real life. These are normal, or 'rectilinear'
wideangles. Even if we had a lens with essentially
no 'distortion' in this technical sense, we would
still perceive an imaging distortion in wideangles
which causes close-up portraits to look hideous,
causes round objects to look like ovals in the
corners of pictures, and causes the members of a
group photo who stand at the ends to look like
prime candidates for Weight Watchers. These types
of distortion are unavoidable due to the fact that
we are trying to reproduce an image of the three
dimensional world on a two dimensional surface, and
then are trying to view the picture from the wrong
distance (for correct perspective, and no
distortion, we should view the picture from a
distance so that the photo we are looking at covers
the same angle of view that the taking lens did).
Anyways, the lens is doing the job it was designed
to do.
I won't go into the math here, but it can be
easily shown that a rectilinear wideangle cannot
cover 180 degrees. Wideangles with focal lengths
equivalent to 10mm or so on 35mm film have been
produced for large format, and Nikon makes a 13mm
lens. This is about the maximum for rectilinear
wideangles.
To make a single picture which includes,
side-to-side, 180 degrees or more, a different lens
or camera design is needed. One is the swing-lens
camera, which in some forms can take a single
picture encompassing 360 degrees (or more), and
which produces pictures that many people consider
the most distortion free extreme wideangle. But it
cannot take instantaneous photos, ie, not all of
the image gets exposed at the same time, and it
cannot show 180 degrees vertically and horizontally
at the same time. If you want that, you need a
fisheye.
Most fisheyes produce their very wide angles of
view by making the location of an image point
directly proportional to the angle that the object
is away from the optical axis of the lens. So... If
an object is straight in front of you, and you
point the fisheye lens directly at the object, the
image of the object will be in the center of the
film frame. With a 180 degree fisheye, if an object
is at 45 degrees off to the side, to the top,
bottom, etc., the image will appear 1/2 way to the
edge of the image on the film. All fisheyes produce
circular images, whether the film format, say 35mm,
is large enough to cover the entire image (7.5 or
8mm lenses commonly), or can only use the middle,
so that the edges of the cirle and the corners of
the frame coincide (15 to 18mm lenses, usually).
The above also applies to fisheyes that cover 220
degrees (6mm) and 170 degrees (the old 16/3.5 MF
lens). All use the 'equidistant' projection to
produce their image. One lens that was different
was the Nikon 10mm OP lens, where OP stands for
orthographic projection. The primary aim in the
design of this lens was to produce a whole-sky
image where the image density was directly
proportional to the object light value. In other
words, no light falloff, ever, under
any circumstances. Other lenses, of whatever type,
just do not do that. While regular, equidistant
fisheyes produce their images through the formula Y
= c * (Zenith angle), where the zenith is
considered the lens axis, orthographic projection
lenses use a formula Y = c * sin(Zenith angle),
where Y is the distance of the image point from the
picture center and c is a constant, dependant on
the focal length. All fisheyes, by definition,
curve lines that do not run through the zenith
(lens axis), but the OP produces a more irregular
pattern of curves.
|